![]() Thus, to take a standard example, génerative and derívative have different stress patterns not because they are literally derived from génerate and deríve, but because the stress of each derivative must agree with the output stress of its respective corresponding base. For those surviving cases, a major strategy within optimality theory has been to capture cyclic relations by surface "output-output" (O/O) constraints. Some of the proposed cyclic analyses have been argued not to require cyclicity, or to represent lexical relations that are not totally productive (as in certain cases in English). Over the past several decades there has been recurrent skeptism concerning cyclic derivations in phonology, one of the most central tenets of traditional generative and lexical phonology and morphology. Initial Vowel Length in Lulamogi: Cyclity or Globality? The demo will show the machine, and discuss how to download and run it. The machine also includes standard packages: opensesame, Praat, Wavesurfer, sox, ffmpeg, edgetrack. audiolabel - A Python library for reading audio annotation files.convertlabel - A tool for converting between audio annotation formats.xwaves - A collection of speech signal processing for command-line scripting.wxklsyn - An implementation of the Klatt speech synthesizer.make_text_grids - An implementation of the Penn Forced Aligner for aligning with marked up transcripts.ifcformant - Inverse Filter Control formant tracking, which seems to be a very good formant tracking method.BPM runs in VirtualBox on Mac, PC, and Linux, and has a number of standard and custom software packages for phonetic research. We will demonstrate a virtual linux machine that we are calling The Berkeley Phonetics Machine. SEPTEMBER 22 - Ronald Sprouse and Keith Johnson (UC Berkeley) ![]() Instead, phonological learning is biased by a preference for alternations involving phonetically similar segments. These findings show that input statistics alone cannot account for how infants learn phonological alternations. Our results demonstrate that infants generalize phonological learning in ways that are not predicted from the input alone and sometimes even fail to learn patterns available in their input. We tested this claim in one artificial language study and one natural language study involving 12-month-old infants. Researchers have suggested that learners are biased to prefer phonological mappings between sounds that are phonetically similar (Steriade, 2001 Peperkamp et al., 2006 Wilson, 2006 White, 2014). Phonetic similarity biases phonological learning in infants SEPTEMBER 8 - Myfany Turpin (University of Queensland)Ībstract SEPTEMBER 15 - Megha Sundara (UCLA)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |